Twitter’s Flight JS Framework: First thoughts and comparison with Backbone


Hey,

Twitter released earlier today a new JS framework called Flight. You can check it out at Github

After reading the documentation, downloading it, and trying it for a while, I’ve my first thoughts.

Basically, what this framework provides is a way to create components. Each component is then “binded” or “assigned” to a certain node in the DOM element. This node can be a div, span, table, button or any other HTML element. That component will take care of all of the actions regarding it’s elements. It could be change one element’s color, adding another text, handling a button click or receiving custom events. Each component can trigger and “listen to” custom events or DOM events. This is the only way components can communicate with each other, as they’ll never know another component. It’s a 100% decoupled. I think this sums up what the new framework is about.

Now, some comments about this implementation:

I love and hate an event model at the same time. In one way, it’s 100% decoupled with actually rules, as you can reutilize each component wherever you want. However, working with events make it almost impossible to debug your code. You see tons of events “flying” around, with no easy way of knowing who, when, where and why each event was launched. It can be debugged, but it can be painful at first. So, it’s a tough call, but I actually still like events. I think that a way to debug this events easily should be added somehow.

Each of this components reminds me to Backbone’s View object. Backbone is a very well known MVP for JavaScript. In backbone each view is binded to an element as well, which can be received as a parameter, and then you can hook to both dom events and custom events. However, Backbone also has a Router (to handle URL changes via HTML5′s pushState or #!), models (Which can call your RestAPI easily) and that’s it.

However, in Backbone, one View can have a nested view or a list of nested views inside. So, imagine that you have an ul which is a Component or view. And, you want to dinamically add a lot of Li’s with some configuration. I haven’t found a way of having a Component “know” its child components in Flight. I know that that’s part of the architecture of no component knows another one, but I think that for child components, they should make an exception. I don’t think that a parent with its child should communicate via events. So, I do like that of Backbone and not on Flight.

What does Flight do really well? In my opinion 2 things.

1) Mixins. I love Flight’s mixins. You can create some “common” behaviour that can then be easily added to any component. So, let’s assume that all your components need to turn red if an event coolEvent is triggered. Instead of coding this in every Component, we just create a mixin that does it, and add this mixin to every component. This is awesome and makes you follow DRY (Don’t repeat yourself). Backbone should definitely add this!

2) Component’s lifecycle. When a certain Component is to be removed or changed from the DOM, it’s important to remove and clear certain JS variables so as not to have Memory Leaks. Flight allows us to do this with some cool hooks, but backbone doesn’t. I think that every JS frameworks should have a tearDown for objects. Open any webpage and leave it open for 1 hour and you’ll see that it consumes a bunch of memory. Every website has memory leaks. Yes, even Facebook! hahaah

So, will I use Flight? If I’m having some Rest API and then the Website, the answer is NO. Backbone has almost everything that Flight has, an even more. I thought that Backbone was lightweight but Flight is even more!

I hope you liked the quick review :) See yaa!

Related Posts

Gulp is awesome, but do we really need it?

New Play Framework 2 Video Course: How to create WebApps

Angularytics: The solution to tracking page views and events in a SPA with AngularJS

comments powered by Disqus